Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 2, 1997No. Nos. 96-104 C, 96-103 CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS *

WIESE, Judge.

Plaintiff is a public utility power company that is suing here to recover part of the funds that it paid to the United States under a long-term contract — now concluded — for the purchase of electrical energy generated at the government’s Hoover Dam facility in Boulder, Colorado. The essence of the claim is that the government has misread the contract’s pricing provisions and consequently *57failed to correctly compute the amount of rate refund due plaintiff upon completion of the contract in 1987.

The government denies…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  5. Oliver-Finnie Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southern California Edison Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Easter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Garner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Florida Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Southern California Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API