Legal Opinion

Paillet v. Vroman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1942No. Civ. 11821PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is a suit for the collection of a deficiency judgment. The complaint was filed on November 28, 1927; an answer and cross-complaint on January 20, 1928; an amended answer and cross-complaint on the 24th of February, 1928, and an answer to the cross-complaint on May 5, 1928. On June 22, 1932, a stipulation was entered into between the parties extending the time within which the action might be brought to trial “to a date subsequent to February 24, 1933,” the stipulation further reciting that it was intended as a waiver of section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure and of “the right, if…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Williams v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Shirley v. BrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. White v. SeitzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Miller v. YorkNevada Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API