Legal Opinion

Williams v. Reed

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1957No. S. F. 19343PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an appeal by defendants Arvidson, Carroll and Cairns, makers (with Reed who does not appeal) of a $30,000 promissory note, from a deficiency judgment, after sale under a securing chattel mortgage, in favor of plaintiff, payee of the note.

Two negotiable notes, one for $30,000, bearing 5 per cent interest, and the other for $10,000, were dated June 14, 1950. The first became due in 60 days and the second on December 14, 1950, and named all the makers as such with plaintiff as payee. They recited that “I” promise to pay the principal and interest. The notes were secured by a chattel…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. People v. SesslinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. In Re FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Moore v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Common Wealth Insurance Systems, Inc. v. KerstenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Janisse v. Winston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. O'NEIL v. General Security Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API