White v. Seitzman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
This case involves an appeal by plaintiffs to recover treble damages for interest under the Usury Law of California, Statutes 1919, page lxxxiii, Deerings General Laws, 1954, Act 3757. Two promissory notes were involved, each secured by deeds of real property. The court found that the transactions relating to these notes and trust deeds were in fact loans of money from defendants to plaintiffs, and not sales of trust deeds as contended by defendants. The court further found that the transactions were usurious, which fact was known or should have been known to all parties involved. The trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Janisse v. Winston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Reynolds v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Martin v. Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Eiberger v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
- Golden State Lanes v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- McClung v. SaitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.