Shirley v. Britt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
This is an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure the payment of a promissory note executed by the defendants on January 2, 1951, and providing for the payment to plaintiffs of the sum of $29,000, on demand, together with interest at the rate of 8 per cent per arninm, and attorney’s fees. Defendants in their answer admitted the execution of the note and mortgage and claimed a credit on the principal of said note in the sum of $17,100 by reason of payments made on it between January 1, 1951 and November 1, 1955. They further alleged that there was no consideration for the note…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Westman v. DyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Andrews v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Taylor v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Estate of McAfeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Garver v. BraceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.