Legal Opinion

Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1983No. TC 80-04870, CA A24941, SC 29596PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This case arises under the Workers’ Compensation Act. We allowed review to determine the permanency of SAIF’s original acceptance of a claim for medical benefits. We hold that once an insurer has accepted a claim under ORS 656.262(6), which requires acceptance or denial of a workers’ compensation claim within 60 days after the employer has notice or knowledge of the claim, the insurer may not subsequently deny the compensability of the underlying claim.

FACTS

Claimant was a tool and die maker at Omark Industries. In October of 1977, claimant alleged that a bursitis condition was compensable as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frasure v. Agripac, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Jacobson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. North Clackamas School Dist. v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Johnson v. Spectra PhysicsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API