Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
This case arises under the Workers’ Compensation Act. We allowed review to determine the permanency of SAIF’s original acceptance of a claim for medical benefits. We hold that once an insurer has accepted a claim under ORS 656.262(6), which requires acceptance or denial of a workers’ compensation claim within 60 days after the employer has notice or knowledge of the claim, the insurer may not subsequently deny the compensability of the underlying claim.
FACTS
Claimant was a tool and die maker at Omark Industries. In October of 1977, claimant alleged that a bursitis condition was compensable as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frasure v. Agripac, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Jacobson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by95 opinions
- North Clackamas School Dist. v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Johnson v. Spectra PhysicsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.