Legal Opinion

Mathis v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 27, 1972No. 371-740PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

Claimant incurred a compensable occupational disease, asbestosis, during the course of his employment. His claim against his last employer was denied by the State Accident Insurance Fund, the defendant. Claimant requested a hearing on his rejected claim and, pursuant thereto, an order was entered by the hearing officer of the Workmen’s Compensation Board denying the claim because there was “neither medical-causal relationship or legal-causal relationship connecting this workman’s asbestosis with his * * * [last] employer.”

Claimant rejected the order of the hearing officer, which, under ORS…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Olson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Livingston v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Gregory v. Peabody Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Osteen v. A. C. & S., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lowery v. McCormick Asbestos Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Flor v. HolguinHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API