Legal Opinion

Ebbtide Enterprises v. Tucker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1987No. WCB 83-00889, 83-03022, 83-03550; CA A33743; SC S33464PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This case arises under the Workers’ Compensation Law. The issue is whether the rule of Bauman v. SAIF, 295 Or 788, 670 P2d 1027 (1983), which prohibits “backup” denials 1 of the compensability of a claimant’s injury, applies to backup denials of responsibility for a claimant’s injuries where the claimant’s benefits are not affected. If the Bauman rule applies we must address the subsidiary issue of whether claimant’s failure to disclose a previous injury was a misrepresentation sufficiently “material” to justify a backup denial in this instance. An independent issue is whether the Court of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. KearnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Destael v. Nicolai Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Retchless v. Laurelhurst ThriftwayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Wills v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Greenbriar Ag Management v. LemusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. EBI Companies v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Oak Crest Care Center v. BondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API