Matter of Compensation of Starbuck
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Self-insured employer Boise Cascade Corporation (Boise) seeks judicial review of a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) that Boise is responsible for an aggravation of claimant’s low back condition. Boise argues that a subsequent employer, insured by SAIF, is responsible under the “last injurious exposure” rule, which this court supposedly applied in Smith v. Ed’s Pancake House, 27 Or App 361, 364, 556 P2d 158 (1976). We affirm.
Claimant had no history of low back problems before 1978. His job as a barker saw operator with Boise involved facilitating the moving of logs on a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. Ed's Pancake HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Mathis v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. KearnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Peterson v. Eugene F. Burrill LumberOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Donald M. Drake Co. v. LundmarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Petshow v. Portland Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.