Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case was entered in 1960 and 1961.1 It is described on the invoices as “Unwoven Wooden Blind Material, Mahogany Sticks” or “Unwoven Wooden Blind Material, Philippine Mahogany Slats,” and is in the following sizes:
" x i/10" x 80".%6"x%o"x96"
7/i6"x%0"x74 rr
'7/i6"xy10"x96 //
It was assessed with duty at 16% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Annecy Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 52373, and T.D. 52476, as manufactures in chief value of wood, not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guy D. Schooler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Emery v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Hayes-Sammons Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Bailey-Mora Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Productol Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.