Legal Opinion
Productol Chemical Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided May 28, 1975No. Court Nos. 70/63006PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
The question involved in these 14 consolidated actions is the dutiable tariff status of certain merchandise invoiced as “Cresylic Compounds Grade 2490,” which was manufactured in West Germany, shipped from the Netherlands and entered at the port of Los Angeles at various times between January 1968 and February 1970.
The merchandise was classified and assessed for duty under item 403.46, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), as other coal tar distillates which on being subjected to distillation yield in the portion distilling below 215° C. a quantity of tar acids equal to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Guy D. Schooler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- B. Axelrod & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blakley Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
- Sarne Handbags Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Continental Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- ADC Telecomms., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.