Legal Opinion

Emery v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 11, 1952No. C. D. 1427PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The ultimate consignees of the merchandise involved in this case were two farmers each of whom wished to construct a silo on his farm. They contacted a sawmill operator in Canada, gave him the dimensions in height and diameter of the silos they wished to construct, and ordered from him the wooden material for the walls of the silos. In response to the orders, the sawmill operator turned out so-called “match boards” or “match planks,” approximately 5% inches wide by 1% inches thick in their dressed condition, planed on two sides, and tongued and grooved on the edges. *304Apparently,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pan American Airways, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Bailey-Mora Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Shades, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API