Legal Opinion

Chas. Kurz Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 20, 1966No. C.D. 2733PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, consists of “centering microscopes,” imported from France and entered at the port of Philadelphia in November and December of 1957.1 They were assessed with duty at 45 per *75centum ad valorem under paragraph. 228 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Protocol of Terms of Accession by Japan to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 53865 and T.D. 53877, as microscopes, not specially provided for, valued over $50 each. It is claimed by amendment to the protests that they are dutiable at 15 per…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. John S. Connor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Bradlow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. American Feldmuehle Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. B. Shackman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API