Hayes-Sammons Chemical Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge:
The merchandise involved in the two cases presently before the court is covered by two protests, No. 58/17794 and No. 60/27892, and is described on the invoices and entries as crude barytes ore in bulk, low-grade barytes ore. That covered by protest No. 58/17794 was entered on April 10, 1958, and was assessed with duty at $2.70 per ton under paragraph 67 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, as barytes ore, crude or unmanufactured. That covered by protest No. 60/27892…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- John S. Connor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Victoria Gin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Mireles v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- A.N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986