Legal Opinion

Friedman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 28, 1963No. C.D. 2415PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise in the case at bar consists of certain Philippine mahogany slats or sticks imported in the following dimensions:

y8"xylo"x80"

y8"xy10"x9Q"

15/i6"x%o"x80"

15/i6"xy10"x96"

A sample representative of the merchandise involved consisting of two pieces of wood but which as imported was in one piece, which had been broken up for convenience of inspection, was received in evidence as plaintiff’s exhibit 1 (it. 5). A catalog, illustrating articles produced from material such as the imported slats, depicting folding doors and room dividers “made of grained Philippine Mahogany…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Rink v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. C. S. Emery & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Bailey-Mora Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API