Legal Opinion

Bailey-Mora Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 26, 1966No. C.D. 2737PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these cases, which have been consolidated, was imported from Mexico and entered at the port of El Paso, Tex., on various dates in 1961,1962, and 1963.1 All of the items were assessed with duty at 16% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Annecy Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 52373 and T.D. 52476, as manufactures of wood, not specially provided for. Various claims are made in the protests, as amended, but that relied upon is that the items are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Bendix Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. Emery v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. Aaron Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Bailey-Mora Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API