Legal Opinion
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Strope
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 3, 1992No. CX-91-1488PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
This matter involvés consolidated declaratory judgment actions with cross motions for summary judgment. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. (Western National) challenges the trial court’s determination that Western National has a duty to provide no-fault coverage and indemnification to David Strope for damages claimed by Doris Strope, and to provide basic economic loss benefits to Doris Strope. Judgment was entered pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 54.-02.
FACTS
The following is a summary of the facts stipulated to by the parties for purposes of the declaratory judgment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. LindseyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Garrison v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Garrison v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Kemmerer v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. AshantiDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.