Legal Opinion

Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Klug

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1987No. C8-86-731PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Appellants Russell and Wendy Klug petitioned this court to review a decision by the court of appeals affirming the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of respondent Continental Western Insurance Company (Continental). The court held that Russell Klug’s gunshot injury did not arise out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle, and that therefore the appellants’ claims were not covered under no-fault or uninsured motorist benefits. We granted the Klugs’ petition for review and we reverse and remand to the court of appeals for further proceedings.

T…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Classified Insurance Corp. v. VodinelichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Engeldinger v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. AIG Hawaii Insurance v. Estate of CaraangHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Wendell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rischitelli v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API