Legal Opinion

Garrison v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1995No. 71,055PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This is a first-impression automobile insurance coverage case arising from a hunting accident. A shotgun accidentally discharged, injuring Tad Garrison, plaintiff, while Kurt Pfannenstiel, defendant, removed it from Garrison’s car. Garrison’s car was insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). Pfannenstiel’s car was insured by Dairyland Insurance Company (Dairyland).

The district court held that the State Farm and Dairyland policies did not provide liability coverage; the Court of Appeals reversed the district court.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance Group v. United Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. National Family Insurance Co. v. BoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Esfeld Trucking, Inc. v. Metropolitan Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. of Connecticut v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Toler v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. LindseyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cady v. SchrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State Board of Nursing v. RuebkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. Aselco, Inc. v. Hartford Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  5. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API