Legal Opinion
Kemmerer v. State Farm Insurance Companies
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 29, 1994No. C5-93-1578PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals from a judgment, contending the district court erred in vacating a default judgment against respondent Thomas Kemmerer and further challenging the district court’s determination that Kemmerer’s injuries arose out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle under Minn.Stat. § 65B.43, subd. 3 (1988). We affirm.
FACTS
On Memorial Day weekend 1989, respondent Thomas Kemmerer and a group of friends went camping near Bayfield, Wisconsin. Before leaving the Twin Cities on Friday, May 27, 1989, Dave Jonk and another man…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Sommers v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Imperial Premium Finance, Inc. v. GK Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. MarvinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Kern v. Auto Owners Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Steinfeldt v. AMCO Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Alexis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.