State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Partridge
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
The instant case presents a somewhat novel question of insurance coverage: when two negligent acts of an insured—one auto-related and the other non-auto-related—constitute concurrent causes of an accident, is the insured covered under both his homeowner’s policy and his automobile liability policy, or is coverage limited to the automobile policy? State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm), the insurer which issued both policies at issue in this case,1 brought this declaratory judgment *97action requesting a determination-as to which one, or both, of its policies afforded…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by310 opinions
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Daniel Kunin v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
305 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.