Legal Opinion

Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Noska

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1983No. Cl-82-609PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

I

Waseca Mutual Insurance Company (Waseca Mutual), plaintiff in a declaratory judgment action, appeals from an order ruling that it, as homeowner’s insurer for defendant David Noska (Noska) rather than Illinois Farmers Insurance Company (Illinois Farmers), the liability insurer of Nos-ka’s automobile, must defend and indemnify Noska for liability arising out of extraordinary fires caused by Noska’s negligence. Waseca Mutual further appeals from the order determining that, under the unique facts of this case, its policy affords $300,000, rather than $100,000, of coverage.

Noska…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. State Capital Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. WattsTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API