Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Blackburn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1980No. 7910DC1099PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

The only question on appeal is whether the court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants. Generally, summary judgment is not appropriate in negligence cases where the standard of the reasonably prudent man is to be applied to the facts. Page v. Sloan, 281 N.C. 697, 190 S.E. 2d 189 (1972); Robinson v. McMahan, 11 N.C. App. 275, 181 S.E. 2d 147, cert. denied, 279 N.C. 395, 183 S.E. 2d 243 (1971). However, summary judgment may be appropriate in negligence cases when it appears there can be no recovery for plaintiff even if the facts as claimed by plaintiff are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Clark v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Robinson v. McMahanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cox v. HaworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Frendlich v. Vaughan's Foods of Henderson, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Cutchin v. PledgerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Southern Watch Supply Co. v. Regal Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API