Legal Opinion

Frendlich v. Vaughan's Foods of Henderson, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1983No. 829SC800PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The question presented for review is whether summary judgment for defendant was proper. For the reasons that follow, we hold that it was.

On a motion for summary judgment, the question before the Court is whether the pleadings, discovery documents and affidavits, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-movant, support a finding that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c); Stanley v. Walker, 55 N.C. App. 377, 285 S.E. 2d 297 (1982); Patterson v. Reid, 10 N.C. App. 22, 178…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Patterson Ex Rel. Jones v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Garner v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Coleman v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Cox v. HaworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pulley v. Rex HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. McLaughlin v. Barclays American Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Robinson v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Stoltz v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Pulliam v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API