Southern Watch Supply Co. v. Regal Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment in that plaintiffs evidence does present a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the negligence of defendant proximately caused plaintiffs loss. We agree with this contention and reverse the order of the trial court.
Summary judgment is proper only where there are no material facts in issue. Kessing v. National Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971). However, summary judgment is a drastic remedy and should be exercised with caution. Moore v. Bryson, 11 N.C. App.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Edwards v. AkionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Watch Supply Co. v. Regal Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Whitaker v. Town of Scotland NeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Conti v. Fid. Bank (In re NC & VA Warranty Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018
- Murphey v. Georgia Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990