Legal Opinion

Page v. Sloan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 31, 1972No. 10PublishedCited by 220 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Did the Court of Appeals err in reversing summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of defendants? Answer depends upon whether defendants, in light of an innkeeper’s duty to a guest, have borne the burden which the law places upon a movant for summary judgment.

What standard of care is required of innkeepers with respect to their guests?

An innkeeper is not an insurer of the personal safety of his guests. He is required to exercise due care to keep his premises in a reasonably safe condition and to warn his guests of any hidden peril. Barnes v. Hotel Corp., 229 N.C.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by220 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API