Pridgen v. Hughes
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Summary judgment procedure was first used in England under a rule adopted in 1855 and was applicable only to actions upon bills of exchange and promissory notes. Apparently, New York was the first State in the United States to adopt the procedure, following the English model. Clark, Summary Judgments, 2 F.R.D. 364 (1943). The New York rule originally applied only to a debt or liquidated demand arising on either contract or judgment for a stated sum. Subsequent amendments enlarged the categories of actions available for motion for summary judgment by plaintiff and allowed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Evelyn Edmondson Bland v. Norfolk and Southern Railroad Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Griffith v. William Penn Broadcasting Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Jenkins v. BrothersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Theresa M. Richardson v. Alfred Morinobu KubotaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by48 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Loy v. Lorm Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Cockerham v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Patterson Ex Rel. Jones v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Johnson v. Trustees of Durham Technical Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.