Legal Opinion

Robinson v. McMahan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1971No. 7128SC293PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.'

It is not the purpose of the summary judgment procedure to resolve disputed material issues of fact, but rather to determine if such issues exist. “The purpose of the Summary Judgment procedure provided by Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure is to ferret out those cases in which there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and in which, upon such undisputed facts, a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The burden is upon the moving party to establish the lack of a triable issue of fact.” Haithcock v. Chimney Rock Company, 10 N.C. App. 696, 179 S.E. 2d 865…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eleanora B. Cobb Rogers v. Peabody Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  2. Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Clark v. ScheldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Haithcock v. Chimney Rock CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Racine v. BoegeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Siders v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Durham v. VineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Gladstein v. South Square AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Miller Ex Rel. Yeager v. SnipesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API