Legal Opinion

Cutchin v. Pledger

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1984No. 831SC1106PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Plaintiff first assigns as error the trial court’s granting of summary judgment on all issues in favor of defendants Pledger and Francis. We find no error.

Summary judgment is a device whereby judgment is rendered before trial if the pleadings, depositions, interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with any affidavits, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Co., 300 N.C. 247, 266 S.E. 2d 610 (1980). The goal of this procedural device is to allow…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Gladstein v. South Square AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Asheville Contracting Co. v. City of WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Silvers v. Horace Mann InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. RowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Coffin v. ISS Oxford Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Weber v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API