Legal Opinion

Whittaker v. White

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1934No. 23589PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwindadl, J.

This is an equitable action brought by the defendant in error Myrtle B. White, as plaintiff in the court below, to reform a deed wherein she was grantor, and the plaintiff in error, T. W. Whittaker, defendant below, was grantee. Both parties in their briefs have chosen to designate the parties as they wore designated in the trial court, and they will be so referred to herein, the plaintiff in error as defendant and defendant in error as plaintiff. The defendant in error D. B. Ellis was brought into the lower court on the application of defendant and appeared there as a defendant, but whatever…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Foxwell v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Joiner v. Ardmore Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Newbern v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Bagby v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Campbell v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Crockett v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Harrell v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. BensoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Crabb v. ChisumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Fabbro v. ReeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API