Legal Opinion
Bagby v. Martin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 15, 1926No. 17132PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion toy
STEPHENSON, C.
Clydie I-Icwell, a duly enrolled Creek freedwoman. was allotted land situated in what is now Tulsa county. The allottee died about April 5, 1911, leaving her noncitizen husband, and her mother, Laura Martin, as her next of kin. The husband asserted ownership to an undivided one-half interest in the allotment, as an heir of his wife, and sold and conveyed the interest to Oliver Bagby and J. S. Thomason on April 27, 1911, for the consideration of $1,500.
The plaintiffs in error claimed ownership to the undivided one-half interest, received rents and profits therefrom,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Shelby v. GuySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Olcott v. SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oklahoma County v. Queen City Lodge No. 197, I. O. O. F.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Crockett v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Coats v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hann v. City of Clinton, Okl. Ex Rel. SchuetterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- State v. StoutCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.