Cinco Enterprises, Inc. v. Benso
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ALMA WILSON, Justice.
The dispositive question is whether Cinco Enterprises, Inc., appellee, is entitled to a money judgment as a matter of law on its claim that Pasquale Benso, appellant, promised to answer for five promissory notes signed by Steve J. Benso and sued on herein. We answer in the negative and hold that the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Cinco Enterprises, Inc.
THE FACTS.
The parties do not dispute the basic facts. Steve J. Benso, the son of Pasquale Benso, appellant, was indebted to the Norman Bank of Commerce on the five promissory notes. The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Richard M. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Shaffer v. JefferySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Bowers v. WimberlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Wright v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Lincoln Farm, L.L.C. v. OppligerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Thompson v. Estate of H. H. CoffieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.