Crabb v. Chisum
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action to reform two promissory notes, to recover judgment thereon as- reformed, and to foreclose the real estate mortgage securing them. The trial court granted the relief prayed for, and defendants appeal. The facts are as follows:
Plaintiffs, residing in Oklahoma City, contracted by letter with defendants, who reside in Clinton, Okla., for the sale of certain real estate. Defendants were to pay $4,500; $1,500 to be in cash and the balance to be evidenced by three notes in the sum of $1,-000 each, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent, per annum from date. Plaintiffs prepared…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McCaskill v. TooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Whittaker v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Noble v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Green v. Cox MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Higgins v. ClassenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Exxon Corporation v. Allen GannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Yeargan v. Bank of Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Fabbro v. ReeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Nelson v. DaughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.