Legal Opinion

Crabb v. Chisum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 14, 1938No. 27634PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an action to reform two promissory notes, to recover judgment thereon as- reformed, and to foreclose the real estate mortgage securing them. The trial court granted the relief prayed for, and defendants appeal. The facts are as follows:

Plaintiffs, residing in Oklahoma City, contracted by letter with defendants, who reside in Clinton, Okla., for the sale of certain real estate. Defendants were to pay $4,500; $1,500 to be in cash and the balance to be evidenced by three notes in the sum of $1,-000 each, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent, per annum from date. Plaintiffs prepared…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McCaskill v. TooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Whittaker v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Noble v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Green v. Cox MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Higgins v. ClassenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Exxon Corporation v. Allen GannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. Yeargan v. Bank of Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Fabbro v. ReeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Nelson v. DaughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API