Legal Opinion

Lampson Lumber Co. v. Hoer

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 2, 1952PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

The plaintiff’s action is one of debt on judgment. The answer of the defendant is a general denial and a special defense alleging that he was not served with process and did not receive notice of the pendency of the original action. This is denied by the plaintiff’s reply. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed. The plaintiff has filed a cross appeal which does not challenge the correctness of the judgment but does assert that the court erred in admitting parol evidence of certain facts concerning what had been done to effect service upon the defendant in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Coit v. HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  3. Clover v. UrbanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Cugno v. KaelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Jeffery v. FitchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Convalescent Center of Bloomfield, Inc. v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Joe's Pizza, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. D'OCCHIO v. Connecticut Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. In re Shamika F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API