Malone v. Steinberg
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
O’Sullivan, }.
The plaintiff brought this action against Ann Steinberg, Hyman Steinberg, Rebecca Bercowetz and Kalman Bercowetz. The complaint is in two counts, one directed against the Steinbergs, the other against the Bercowetzes. During the course of the trial, Kalman was dropped as a party defendant. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff to recover from the remaining three. Of these, only the Steinbergs have appealed. We shall refer to them as the defendants and shall limit our discussion to the count addressed to them.
The court found the following facts: In 1946 the defendants…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McKenna v. WhippleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Nash Engineering Co. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- McCarthy v. DaunisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Tortorici v. Sharp Moosop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Berman v. KlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.