Legal Opinion
Clover v. Urban
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 18, 1928PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The finding discloses that the defendant, Norah Urban, brought an action in the City Court of Waterbury, against one Kasimir Klovar, by writ dated November 13th, 1917. No one appeared to defend the action, and January 3d, 1920, judgment by default was rendered for Norah Urban, for $286 and costs. By writ dated June 24th, 1920, she brought an action on this judgment, against the present plaintiff, James Clover, attaching therein some of his property. Kasimir Klovar is not and never was the name of the present plaintiff, James Clover, and he has never been known by that name. The officer who…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Clegg v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- State v. GorhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
- Perry v. HydeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
- Strong v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- City of Waterbury v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Cugno v. KaelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.