Legal Opinion
Convalescent Center of Bloomfield, Inc. v. Department of Income Maintenance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 5, 1988No. 13311PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The central issue in this appeal is whether a litigant is collaterally estopped from rearguing an issue that was adversely decided in an administrative proceeding not subject to judicial review. The plaintiffs, Convalescent Center of Bloomfield, Inc., and Maple View Manor, Inc., brought an administrative action pursuant to General Statutes § 17-3141 to contest *189the manner in which the defendant, the department of income maintenance, had calculated their entitlement to rental reimbursement for Medicaid patients. The defendant disallowed this action as an impermissible relitigation of similar…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- City of New Haven v. AFSCME, Council 15, Local 530Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Carothers v. CapozzielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- New England Rehabilitation Hospital of Hartford, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.