Legal Opinion
Joe's Pizza, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 7, 1996No. 15164PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court properly rendered summary judgment against the plaintiff, Joe’s Pizza, Inc. (Joe’s Pizza), on the ground that its claim against the defendant, Aetna Life and Casualty Company (Aetna), is barred by principles of res judicata. We affirm the summary judgment of the trial court.
The pertinent facts and procedural history are not in dispute. At all times relevant to this appeal, Joe’s Pizza was a closely held corporation owned and operated as a restaurant in Windsor by its sole shareholders, Giuseppe and Tina Cappello, who are…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Zizka v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Sheff v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.