Legal Opinion
D'OCCHIO v. Connecticut Real Estate Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 8, 1983No. 10436PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPasskey, J.
The plaintiffs, Candido D’Occhio, Donato Gaetani and Bertram Perlman, by writ, summons and complaint dated March 5, 1975, after due notice to the defendant commission, brought suit against William Braman Pease alleging that Pease, as a real estate salesman for Florida Unlimited, Inc., a real estate broker licensed to do business in the state of Connecticut, had appropriated substantial sums of their money for his own use through fraud and misrepresentations. The plaintiffs moved for an order of notice alleging that the whereabouts of Pease were unknown, and that Pease was a fugitive from…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Sportsmen's Boating Corp. v. HensleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Bennett v. New Milford Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Commissioner of Motor Vehicles v. DeMiloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Robert S. Weiss & Co. v. MullinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.