Legal Opinion
In re Shamika F.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 12, 2001No. SC 16263PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether a temporary custody order entered by the Superior Court for Juvenile Matters pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 46b-129 (a) and (b)2 is a final *385judgment for purposes of appeal. The respondent father, Genero F.,3 argues that the trial court improperly issued temporary custody orders and that he was entitled to “postpone” his appeal of those temporary orders until issuance of a final judgment terminating his parental rights. We disagree and conclude, as we did in Madigan v. Madigan, 224 Conn. 749, 757, 620 A.2d 1276…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- In re Juvenile Appeal (83-CD)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- In re Juvenile Appeal (84-AB)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Roth v. WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Sweeney v. SweeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- In re D.D.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- In re Jeisean M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.