Legal Opinion
Cugno v. Kaelin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 13, 1951PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
In this action upon a judgment, the defendant, Felix Kaelin, interposed a defense that the judgment as against him was void because no process was legally served upon him in the action in which it was rendered. The trial court sustained this defense and the plaintiff has appealed.
The finding, with the addition of facts that are admitted or undisputed, so that it presents more clearly the question of law involved (Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. § 93), discloses the following: On December 23, 1948, the Court of Common Pleas at Hartford rendered judgment for the plaintiff to recover of Felix Kaelin…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clover v. UrbanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Palmer v. ThayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
- Buckingham v. OsborneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- United States Guarantee Co. v. GiarelliConnecticut Superior Court · 1947
- Coast Lakes Contracting Corporation v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Jenkins v. Bishop Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Lampson Lumber Co. v. HoerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Collins v. ScholzConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
- Plonski v. HalloranConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.