Legal Opinion

Doyle v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 24, 1939No. Nos. 31,969, 31,970PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

In this action by a teacher in the public schools of the city of St. Paul against the city, its mayor, councilmen, and comptroller to recover a balance of salary claimed unpaid for the fiscal or calendar year of 1934, and also for a balance claimed unpaid for the year 1937, the trial court disallowed the $10.57 claimed for 1934, but awarded judgment for-$188 for the amount claimed for 1937. Plaintiff appeals from the order refusing her a new trial as to the $10.57; and defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for amended findings or a new trial as to the amount…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. Common School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Olsen v. Independent & Consolidated School District No. 50Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Putnam v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Sutton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Gillis v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Independent School District v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Frisk v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. BellowsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Doyle v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API