Legal Opinion
Martin v. Common School District No. 3
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 12, 1925No. 24,684PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in his action for damages for an alleged breach of teacher’s contract.
The school hoard of a common school district is the exclusive agency for the making of teachers’ contracts. G. S. 1923, § 2903; Leland v. School Dist. No. 28, 77 Minn. 469, 80 N. W. 354; Andrews v. School Dist. No. 4, 37 Minn. 96, 33 N. W. 217; McGuiness v. School Dist. No. 10, 39 Minn. 499, 41 N. W. 103. No contract shall be made or authorized by the board except at a meeting of the board of which all members have had legal notice. G. S. 1923, § 2814.-The chairman and clerk,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Board of County Commissioners v. DickeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Newbery v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Jewell Belting Co. v. Village of BerthaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hosford v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Landers v. Board of Education of Town of Hot SpringsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Myers v. Greater Clark County School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hueman v. Independent School District No. 77Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Oxman v. Independent School District of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.