Legal Opinion
Doyle v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 29, 1939No. 32,196PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
After trial -without a jury and decision adverse to her, plaintiff appeals from the judgment for defendant.
Before 1932 plaintiff had served as teacher in the public schools of St. Paul for more than the three years required to establish her rights and status as a “tenure teacher” under L. 1927, c. 36, 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 2935-1, et seq. She taught during the entire school year of 1932, and seeks by this action to recover $58.75, which she claims was a portion of her salary for that year wrongfully withheld by the city.
In June of 1932 plaintiff received from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Phelps v. Board of Ed. of West New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Holyoke Water Power Co. v. American Writing Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Mootz v. BelyeaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Bemis Bro. Bag Company v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Doyle v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- Minnesota Association of Public Schools v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Frisk v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Pratts v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. Northwest Linseed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941