State v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment affirming an order of the Kailroad and Warehouse Commission requiring the reestablishment of railroad passenger service on defendant’s lines hereinafter described.
For the sake of brevity, we shall include only those facts deemed essential to an understanding of the issues to be determined.
Defendant Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company, referred to hereinafter as the railway company, is a railway corporation, organized under the laws of Minnesota, engaged in operating as a common carrier of passengers and freight. It operates…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- State ex rel. Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Steenerson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Minneapolis Van & Warehouse Co. v. St. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- State Ex Rel. McGinnis v. Police Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Amdahl v. County of FillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.