Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Board of Education

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1936No. 30,736PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

This is an action by one of defendant’s school teachers to recover a balance of salary claimed to be due him from the commencement of the school year of 1934-1935 until the beginning of the action. At the close of the testimony each party moved the court for a directed verdict. Plaintiff’s motion was denied. Defendant’s was granted. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

There is no dispute as to the facts involved. Defendant is organized under Sp. L. 1891, c. 312, and governed by its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. School City of Elwood v. State Ex Rel. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Paquette v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Fidler v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. State ex rel. Nyberg v. Board of School DirectorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State Ex Rel. Brown v. Polk CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kummet v. ThielenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Frisk v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Hosford v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Doyle v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. 510 Groveland Avenue, Inc. v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API