Legal Opinion
Frisk v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF DULUTH
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1956No. 36,654, 36,655PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Plaintiffs commenced this action in the District Court of St. Louis County for a determination of their status under the Minnesota Teacher Tenure Act, 2 as employees of defendant, the Board of Education of the City of Duluth, as vocational teachers in what is now an approved area vocational-technical school located in the city of Duluth, embracing an area which includes the counties of Cook, Lake, Carlton, Pine, Aitkin, and the south one-quarter of St. Louis County. They seek a declaratory judgment 3 adjudging that they are, in their present employment as such teachers,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- McSherry v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- People Ex Rel. Callahan v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Paquette v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Perry v. Independent School District No. 696Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Berland v. Special School District No. 1, MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Minnesota Association of Public Schools v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Skeim v. Independent School District No. 115Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.