Independent School District v. City of White Bear Lake
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order striking as sham and frivolous certain parts of the answers, directing judgment in favor of the petitioner, and that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue to compel compliance with the judgment ordered. For convenience we designate the parties as they were designated below. If it were not for the direction in the order that the peremptory writ issue, we would be bound to dismiss the appeal. In State ex rel. Boldt v. St. Cloud M. P. Assn. 200 Minn. 1, 273 N. W. 603, we held that a direction that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue is an irregular…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Galbreath v. NewtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
- First National Bank v. Village of GoodhueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Todd v. BettingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Buckley v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Fargo Foundry Co. v. Village of CallawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schimmelpfennig v. GaedkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Lund v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Meuwissen v. H. E. Westerman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Kirk v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- City of Idabel Ex Rel. Woodroof v. School District No. Five (5) of McCurtain CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.