Legal Opinion
Clouser v. City of Norman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 7, 1964No. 40019PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
On March 10, 1959, the governing body of the City of Norman, Oklahoma, defendant in error, enacted Ordinance No. 1132 annexing four tracts of land to the city, with a zoning classification thereon. The plaintiff in error Clouser owned ten acres involved in Tract No. 3 described in such ordinance.
Prior to the passage of Ordinance No. 1132 there had been enacted as a part of the code of the city, Sec. 441, which reads as follows:
“Section 44. The zoning classification of all land areas annexed to the City of Norman should be made a part of the annexing ordinance or passed by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Taylor v. Haverford TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Pacific Palisades Ass'n v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Marblehead Land Co. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vinson v. MedleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- SWEPI, LP v. Mora CountyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- City of Sand Springs v. ColliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Botchlett v. City of BethanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- City of Hartshorne v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979