Legal Opinion

City of Sand Springs v. Colliver

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 1967No. 41351PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice:

The primary question herein involves the correctness of a judgment granting mandatory injunction. The judgment required plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as the “City”, to change the zoning classification of land owned by defendant in error, herein referred to as plaintiff or the “landowner.” The factual background from which the issues evolved are. summarized hereafter.

At all times involved plaintiff owned a small (0.6 acre), irregular -tract of rough, unimproved land adjacent to the City’s municipal limits. The tract was 265 feet in depth, was bounded on the north' by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Oklahoma City v. BarclaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. City of Tulsa v. SwansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. City of Tulsa v. Board of Trustees of Police PensionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Mattoon v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Vinson v. MedleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. O'ROURKE v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Mid-Continent Life Insurance Co. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API